Saturday 24 May 2014

Bt cotton in Indonesia ; MODUS-OPERANDI OF A SERIAL KILLER : MONSANTO.



MODUS-OPERANDI OF A SERIAL KILLER : MONSANTO.




When something serious is going on , we can no more put on the mask of an hypocrite with "politically correct" attitude. Dude !

Every Indian should do something to save our country even if it is just typing on Facebook. DROP BY DROP WE CAN GROW IN TO A RIVER OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND SANITY AGAINST OBLIVIOUSNESS AND  INSANITY.

When a pick-pocket takes off your purse, you carry and shout and try to beat the hell of that man to get back your 20rs in that purse, then why we should keep mum and do nothing when Big corporates are bribing to sell products they know that are not safe (otherwise, why they have to bribe in the first place ? ).
India needs no just inform with insipid news and manipulated media productions, we need quality documentaries on television that is impartial in his approach. Very sad to say that we are poor in getting reliable information. Television like ARTE should be diffused in Indian languages. 

Why impartial information from ethically motivated medias ? 

Just to know the truth so that we may adjust our social actions to protect what is good for us and avoid what will be a danger for us. It is as simple as this. Not complicated.

What happened in Indonesia, a heavily invaded country by MONSANTO, can serve as a lesson for India too, that 's why I want to inform about how Monsanto played the conspiracy game there to 
preempt here in INDIA.

Here is that Indonesian story : 

When a law or a decree was likely to have an adverse effect on 

Monsanto's business interests in Indonesia, Monsanto lobbied the

environmental ministry to withdraw the decree. 

Sometime in February 2002, an employee of the consulting firm

which represented Monsanto visited an senior official at his home and

gave him an envelope containing US$ 50,000 in $100 bills. Despite the

cash payment, the official never repealed the requirement of an

environmental assessment of Monsanto's products (Saraswati 2005).

Bribery and corruption might be a common feature in many countries 

to ensure that even normal procedures are undertaken, but this case lies

different.

For decades Monsanto has been claiming that their GM crops are

tested and safe. Now it appears that Monsanto employees use bribery to

try to buy the company out of the need for an environmental impact

statement. 

To make matters worse, Monsanto tried to buy itself out of the

requirements of environmental studies in a region where it had been shown

that the environmental differences between the US and Indonesia were so

big that Bt cotton varieties released earlier failed and had to be taken

off the market.

The questions now go beyond Indonesia. If Monsanto finds it necessary to

bribe at least 140 officials and family members for half a decade in a

country that only makes less then 1% of its overall revenue (0.8% of the

overall revenue of 5 billion USD, Monsanto 2004) - what is there to

expect in other places where there's more at stake? All safety data for

Monsanto's GM crops - in terms of human health - are provided to

regulators in countries around the world by Monsanto themselves. As GM

Watch (2005) asks: "If they go to corrupt lengths to avoid impact

studies, what chances are there of data manipulation when it is totally

under Monsanto's control?"

Or should we see it as a success story? The farmers and NGOs protesting

against Bt cotton were right all along, and not even bribery in a country

that is in the Top Ten of the most corrupt countries in the world could

get Monsanto out of the need for environmental testing.


http://www.nwrage.org/content/extensive-article-monsanto-bribes-indonesia

No comments:

Post a Comment